Selected Product:
| The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War
Hardcover
Author: David Halberstam
Publisher: Hyperion
Release Date: 2007-09-25
ISBN-10: 1401300529
ISBN-13: 9781401300524
List Price: $35.00
Average Customer Rating:
  | |
The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court
ISBN-10: 1400096790
ISBN-13: 9781400096794
List Price:$15.95
The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944 (Liberation Trilogy)
ISBN-10: 080508861X
ISBN-13: 9780805088618
List Price:$17.00
Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA
ISBN-10: 0307389006
ISBN-13: 9780307389008
List Price:$16.95
The Best and the Brightest
ISBN-10: 0449908704
ISBN-13: 9780449908709
List Price:$16.95
The War: An Intimate History, 1941-1945
ISBN-10: 0307262839
ISBN-13: 9780307262837
List Price:$50.00
|
To use our price comparison to get the cheapest price, please click on the "Find the Cheapest Price" button located above for The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War by David Halberstam (ISBN-10: 1401300529, ISBN-13: 9781401300524).
At this time we have not yet written a review for The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War by David Halberstam (ISBN-10: 1401300529, ISBN-13: 9781401300524). Please continue to keep checking back to this page as we are constantly adding reviews.
Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com
David Halberstam's magisterial and thrilling The Best and the Brightest was the defining book for the Vietnam War. More than three decades later, Halberstam used his unrivalled research and formidable journalistic skills to shed light on another dark corner in our history: the Korean War. The Coldest Winter is a successor to The Best and the Brightest, even though in historical terms it precedes it.Halberstam considered The Coldest Winter the best book he ever wrote, the culmination of forty-five years of writing about America's postwar foreign policy.Up until now, the Korean War has been the black hole of modern American history.The Coldest Winter changes that. Halberstam gives us a masterful narrative of the political decisions and miscalculations on both sides. He charts the disastrous path that led to the massive entry of Chinese forces near the Yalu, and that caught Douglas MacArthur and his soldiers by surprise. He provides astonishingly vivid and nuanced portraits of all the major figures -- Eisenhower, Truman, Acheson, Kim, and Mao, and Generals MacArthur, Almond, and Ridgway. At the same time, Halberstam provides us with his trademark highly evocative narrative journalism, chronicling the crucial battles with reportage of the highest order.At the heart of the book are the individual stories of the soldiers on the front lines who were left to deal with the consequences of the dangerous misjudgments and competing agendas of powerful men. We meet them, follow them, and see some of the most dreadful battles in history through their eyes. As ever, Halberstam was concerned with the extraordinary courage and resolve of people asked to bear an extraordinary burden.The Coldest Winter is contemporary history in its most literary and luminescent form, and provides crucial perspective on the Vietnam War and the events of today. It was a book that Halberstam first decided to write more than thirty years ago and that took him nearly ten years to write. It stands as a lasting testament to one of the greatest journalists and historians of our time, and to the fighting men whose heroism it chronicles.Includes an Afterword by Russell BakerTributes to David HalberstamDavid Halberstam died at the age of 73 in a car accident in California on April 23, 2007, just after completing The Coldest Winter. Legendary for his work ethic, his kindness to young writers, and his unbending moral spine, Halberstam had friends and admirers throughout journalism, many of whom spoke at his memorial service and at readings across the country for the release of The Coldest Winter. We have included testimonials given at his memorial service by two writers who made their reputations at the same newspaper where he won a Pulitzer Prize for his Vietnam War reporting, The New York Times: Anna Quindlen ...David occupied a lot of space on the planet. Perhaps he felt the price he must pay for that big voice, that big reach, that big reputation, was that his generosity had to be just as large. Most of us, when we take to the road and meet admiring strangers, vow afterward to answer the note pressed into our hands or to pass along the speech we promised to the person whose daughter couldn't be there to hear it. But with the best will in the world we arrive home to deadlines, bills, kids, friends, all the demands of a busy life. We mean to be our best selves, but often we forget. David did it. He always did it. The note, the call, the book, the advice. When I mentioned this once he dug his hands deep intothe pockets of his grey flannels, set his mouth at the corners, looked down and rumbled, "Well, but it's so easy." That's nonsense. It's not easy. But it is important, and why he has been remembered with enormous affection by ordinary readers all over this country, and why each of us who live some sort of public life would do well, with all due respect to Jesus, to ask ourselves about those small encounters: what would David do? ... Read her full tributeDexter Filkins .
When American and China fought
| Customer Rating:  | This book is not so much a history of the Korean War but more a meditation of the role of the war in the development of America's response to the cold war. There is a outline of the operations of the war but most of the narrative deals with the early battles and China's intervention. The last two years of the war are dealt with very briefly indicating that the Americans were able to develop tactics to use their superior firepower to turn the conflict into a draw.
The attraction of the book is that it deals with the historical context better than previous narratives and looks at the American response as something which was flexible rather than fixed and unchanging. It was in response to the Korean war that containment became working strategy of the cold war rather than roll back.
Halberstam sees the war as a disaster for the Democratic Party. The war seemed won after McArthur's landing at Inchon, but the American advance to the Chinese border that seemed to be able to achieve the liberation of the north failed. The Chinese counter attacked the strung out UN troops inflicting a huge initial defeat. This on top of the victory of Mao in China meant that the right wing of the Republican Party was able to tar the Democrats as poor, possibly traitorous defenders of the free world.
The problems of the Democrats was worsened by the actions of McArthur the highly egocentric theatre commander. After General Ridgeway was able to stabilize the UN front and to start inflicting very significant losses on the Chinese McArthur seemed to become jealous and unhinged. He started to call for an all out war against China and suggesting that the Truman administration was cheating the American people of a potential chance to roll back communism in China. Eventually he was sacked by Truman. Not only did Truman seem to have lost China and overseen a huge initial American defeat but he then ended up sacking a national hero. McArthur then attempted to position himself to run for the presidency but things fell apart following his evidence to a Senate inquiry when he revealed himself as an unrepentant idiot.
Halberstam is an admirer of Eisehower and sees him as being a moderate voice that was able to govern the Republicans from the centre and to set in train a response to communism that was rational and measured. When the Democrats again won power under Kennedy they felt that they had to re-fight the battles of the Korean war and show that they were not soft on communism. The Vietnam War arose as a public relations demonstration that the Democrats were not foreign policy push overs rather than a measured examination of the situation on the ground.
At the time the elephant in the room was of course that America decided to fight a full scale conventional war against China. Yet in those days this was never acknowledged or talked about. The discussion was about fighting the North Koreans and supporting Chinese volunteers. Part of the confusion was of course that "China" to the Americans at the time was the Nationalist regime which only controlled Formosa. The enemy was not even recognised as an official entity.
Eisenhower was nothing if not a person who had an open mind and could think. His conclusion from the Korean war was that the US fought under considerable disadvantage. Communication and supply were difficult for the US. Asian powers had large populations which meant that they could fight wars of attrition. He thus formed the view that the US should not involve itself in Asian ground wars. The Vietnam was being a war when one side was able to suffer immense losses of manpower but to continue fighting an attritiononal war that was eventually successful.
|
Once again, Halberstam is predictably great.
| Customer Rating: | Belongs on the shelf with the rest of Halberstam's great books: The Best and the Brighttest et al.
Thank you, David, for another great read, another wonderful and accurate critique. R.I.P.
Sgt Jackson, USMC 1988-2001 |
A Very Incomplete History of the Korean War
| Customer Rating: | | The book is interesting, but a reader expecting a comprehensive history of the Korean War will be disappointed. The focus is on the first four months of the Chinese engagement (Nov 1950 through Feb 1951) and the political background to Truman's discharge of MacArthur. Important battles -- the landing at Inchon and the retreat from Chosin -- are all but ignored. What it covers, it covers well; what it ignores leaves one puzzled. |
Not Halberstam's best work
| Customer Rating: | | If you want to read a book about the Korean War, read T.R. Fehrenbach's "This Kind of War." If you instead want a book that is about Washington insider politics of the era, then maybe Halberstam's book is for you. The serious military historian will not learn much from Halberstam, though it does provide one man's view of the impact Far Eastern political turmoil had on interal U.S. affairs. |
The Coldest Winter
| Customer Rating: | | The Coldest Winter by David Halberstam is not a perfect history of the Korean War. There were two historical facts missing which I think any credible historian would have to mention. One is the incident at the Bridge of Tokun Ri where hundreds of civilians were killed by American troops in what is euphenistically known as a "friendly fire" incident. The other is the disgraceful conduct of the all-Black 92nd Regiment which was disbanded as "unbreliable" after they broke ranks and ran to the rear after hearing their first gunshot. History is a moving target and the first casualty in war is the truth. Here's a tip. Go to any library and check out the books of history of the Vietnam War. If you find no reference to "fraggings", you know you aren't going to read the whole truth but one that has been sanitized. Fraggings refers to the murder or attempted murder of U.S. officers or non-coms by their own men. The weapon of choice was a fragmentation grenade which leaves no fingerprints. More than 1,000 U.S. officers and non-coms were murdered by their own men during the war with thousands more wounded. These are estimates. The U.S. army only kept records for about 18 months in 1970-71 and recorded several hundred fraggings. And this is just one service branch, not counting the Marines, Navy or Air Force. Always read history as a moving target and understand that in a war, the first casulty is truth. |
|
