Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com

Average Customer Rating:

Too much historical detail and not enough analysis of solutions

Customer Rating:

The author examines 3 organizations......1 in the private sector (GM) and 2 in the public sector (NY Transit and City of San Diego) with respects to their pension plans and their financial health. The case of GM is fairly well publicized. In early 2008, Business Week ran an article predicting that GM and Ford really have no choice but to declare bankruptcy...to eliminate their pension plan obligations by passing them along to the US taxpayers. As the author points out, GM went from being one of the most profitable companies in the world paying out good dividends to shareholders......to a money losing HMO on wheels. All 3 cases have the same basic theme of management focusing on short term cash flow and ignoring the long term impact of pension obligations. The only caveat to this general theme is that San Diego threw in dishonesty of elected officials. I had not heard the "Enron-by-the-Sea" story of San Diego before. The author's solution to our private and public pension dilemma is: 1. Nationalized health care with partial payment by the worker. 2. Keep Medicare for 65 and over people (but it has huge unresolved liabilities) 3. Keep Social Security but shift from pay as you go to government savings accounts. 4. Retirement plans should offer more annuity payout options (but the author forgets to point out that annuities offered by Wall Street have extremely high 2% expense ratios). 5. Create and enforce law that public pensions must be fully funded at all times. I found the book to be too long and boring. I am not that interested in every little bit of history that created the problems at the three institutions. I would have rather had less historical detail......and more focus on pros and cons of alternative solutions to the pension problem. If you are interesting in accumulating more assets so you are less dependent on our pension system, I would suggest reading some of the books noted below. Index Mutual Funds: How to Simplify Your Financial Life and Beat the Pro's The Richest Man in Babylon Bogle on Mutual Funds: New Perspectives for the Intelligent Investor The Millionaire Next Door The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing, Ninth Edition The Coffeehouse Investor: How to Build Wealth, Ignore Wall Street, and Get On With Your Life The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing

Interesting Problem, Poor Solutions

Customer Rating:

Very interesting and informative book, enjoyed it immensely. However I part company with the author when it comes to solutions. His only idea seems to be tax increases so the public can pay for the rapacious antics of the public sector unions in particular or so the government can bail out the private sector companys that have caved into unions. And heaven forbid that people actually be allowed to control their own retirement funds and investements, the nanny state uber alles.

Price	Customer Rating:
This is a rediculous price for a Kindle edition that costs the publisher next to nothing (after the initial conversion to the Kindle format) and that I can't share or sell.

Terrific Book!

Customer Rating:

This is a fantastic read! The book discusses the plight our society faces when the bill comes due on pensions and health benefits for many corporations, city and state governments. It prompted me to look at the state of Nevada pension plan for teachers. The plan is grossly underfunded and guess who gets to pay for these benefits when the plan runs out of money. Me, the taxpayer. As of June 30, 2003, Nevada PERS assets had a market value of $14 billion, but actuarial liabilities of $19.5 billion. 5.5 billion in the hole. The book also woke me up to looking at the balance sheet of a company when considering to invest. For example, I would not invest in GM since the majority of their profits go to pay for the pension and health care plans. As a potential stockholder there would be little money left to distribute to me. The book provides the example .."by the late '90s GM was facing the demographic nightmare.." in pensions. GM is "...down to 180,000 hourly employees, compared with a dizzying 400,000 retirees." GM is an example of what Social Security will look like when the money runs out.

Excellent Book-Really drills home pressures on public plans and collectively bargained plans

Customer Rating:

I enjoyed reading this book and it gave me an better understanding on how public and union plans can succumb to the pressures to increase benefits now without having to pay for them until later. Gives a good historical perspective of what was going on at GM, in NYC, and San Diego when their pension plans developed their problems. One thing that is never explicitly stated is that all these governments and unions that crippled their finances by promising generous postretirement medical benefits must be praying for the enactment of universal health care to bail them out of paying for their promised benefits. I had to take a star off for the final chapter on what should be done going forward. I suppose after an excellent history lesson, Mr. Lowenstein felt the need to tie his three vignettes together, generalize the lessons here to the state of all US pension plans, and come up with a set of solutions. However, the problems facing public and union pension plans are different from those that have put private pension plans in decline. Private pension plans have been hurt by overregulation and by the high cost and volatility that these plans have on a company's financials under new and evolving accounting standards. A private company can freeze it's plan (if its not collectively-bargained) and many have chosen to do so to provide benefits with 401(k) plans whose costs are easier to control. The other failing of the last chapter is that, after keeping his politics mostly in check through most of the book, he starts reciting liberal talking points to come up with his solutions. He lauds Hillary Clinton by name for her solution of providing government-paid 401(k) accounts for low income people, but condemns President Bush (along with the right wing) for exaggerating the funding strains on the Social Security system and proposing to partially privatize Social Security with a 401(k)-based solution. After spending the whole book expounding on the problems caused when current benefit promises rely on future cash outlays, he then brushes off the same dynamic when it applies to the Social Security system.